The Tyranny of Facebook: have you ever thought about it? I have several times, in fact, and my two-week trip to China solidified the idea for a comparison of the two. (Disclaimer: Of course, 2 weeks doesn't make me anything close to an expert on China, but I did learn a few things from what I have read and personally observed.) For those of you who use Facebook, you'll understand my examples, even if you aren't particularly familiar with Chinese government and its restrictions, so read on:
1) The requirement to agree with the changes made without the ability to voice objections or questions. Anytime Facebook makes a change to the format (that is, the user interface), you are forced to use it. You aren't asked (anymore) if you like it. Sure, when Facebook made the big change to the "new" Facebook, you were given the option which you wanted to view, but eventually, everyone had to deal with the New version. And okay, some changes made were better in the long-run: having a feed of friends' activities on the home page is the main way I acquire social info on FB, even though when the feeds were first introduced, I didn't like them at all.
But a recent example of this that really bothers me is the change from listing the names Friends On Chat Now to showing the profile pictures of the people online. Having to look at the tiny thumbnail of someone's picture (which often change) simply isn't as fast as reading their name (which almost never change) nor do the "active" sage green dot versus a pale blue "inactive" dot contrast nearly enough. Sure, more pictures in the tyranny of white-and-dull-blue of Facebook are nice, but it's just not practical. Personally, this is the equivalent of someone giving me a pictures-only book instead of a novel. I can read, Facebook designers, I promise!
So where is the Complaint Box of Facebook? No matter how huge the company is, isn't it a bit egotistical to assume you know what's best for the user?
Similarly, China is technically "The People's Republic of China" but the opportunity for input by the average person is simply not given. There is no lobbying, no voting, no public surveys... So when there are changes, people must go along with them, no questions asked.
2) The ability to demonstrate or use creativity is severely limited.
Certainly the company of Facebook is large enough to do a study on consumer preferences and to know what the best arrangement of elements on the page is. But that "classic" White and Dull Blue got old years ago. There are groups petitioning all sorts of things, related to Facebook and not, including the "Petition for Colored Facebook Profiles" but after at least a year of the group's existence, I doubt anything will actually change. (Actually, that dull blue which reminds me of the blue-dominated Microsoft, which also bothers me, and not just because I am a Mac user.)
So one's self-expression is limited to what you post within that bare-bones frame: pictures, status, About Me, and whatever 3rd-party applications you choose to add.
But I suppose that's the trade-off for the clean, professional and homogeneous look of Facebook versus the colorful, open-ended and often-amateurish feel of MySpace.
And so you could make the case about creativity in China. I read a book this summer called "China Road", written by Rob Gifford and which I highly recommend even if you don't plan to visit China (although I recommend that too!). In the book, Gifford argues that China's restrictive government is a major factor for why the top artistic and linguistic innovators have not come from China, even though with their population, the odds are in their favor: banned books, websites and other intellectual resources about the rest of the world hinder people from developing new ideas (especially if they're controversial), theories, and even artistic creations. Sure, you can paint and write books in China, but publishing or displaying any work is subject to scrutiny. And sure, many excellent people who have contributed to the world have come from and, even now, live in China. But Gifford's point (as well as mine now) is that the governmental policy to restrict the people's access to certain information does not foster the ideal creative environment in which to raise up Greats.
3) "If it bothers you so much, then stop using it!" you say. And fair enough. I could simply stop using Facebook and go back to email, MSN Messenger and photo sharing sites, to make up for what I have been using Facebook for. But the sum is greater than the parts, I believe, since the feed feature works so well and the professionalism truly does supercede MySpace. It's called a monopoly, and there's a reason that Facebook has blown every competition out of the water. (Small, related fun fact: I learned last week that every single student in my Public Relations class this semester, which has over 100 students on the attendance list, raised their hand saying that they have a Facebook profile. Is that monopoly on college students, or what?!)
No, no one just stops "using" China, but getting out of the system, is nearly as difficult... Visa rules are tough for residents, not just foreign visitors.
As always, I remain your thoughtful blogger, ever frankly yours,
Ellen P.
P.S. Maybe Facebook's combination of activities that I used to do with separate programs--chat, photo-sharing, email, and more, also lends itself to comparison to Wal-mart, another "tyrannical" company that bothers me, since photo developing, food & clothing & electronic shopping all can be done there now. (As well its use of--again!--the ubiquitous blue, albeit a different hue.)
No comments:
Post a Comment